Fragment 19 – The Death of Irillo

Diaries The Saga Of Berra — Fragment 19

1626


1This fragment appears only in the Suppressed Saga, dating from c. 1630 and ordered burned in Esrolia. We discuss it as a matter written close to the time, despite its rather extraordinary central premise. This fragment is often understood as being in the Scorpion Folk style.Late was the hour at the mansion of Women
Clan of Saiciae feasting the Merchant2Irillo is never directly named here, hence the association with the Scorpion Folk
Robed was the Sword of the Northern Humakti
Armoured in robes3There is no indication of enchantment here; either Berra wore a combination of robes and armour as per the fashion of the later Temple of the Path, or robes were considered sufficient. as the guard of her Master

Water as pale as the clear-wine drank Berra
Nothing she ate as her master was feasting4This would have been considered correct behaviour among Humakti, and rather odd among the Esrolian set of the time, who are likely to have considered the female Berra to have been a guest as well as a guard. The duality of Humakt the champion who is feasted, and Humakt the protector, is here apparent.
Little her lips were to pass in sweet word-play
Little her eyes were to miss in a crisis

Fire came from high in the chamber of eating
Formed as a dart from the bow of Assassin
Striking the wall through the heart of the Merchant5Even an attempted assassination, as is understood to have happened at this juncture, would have been shocking. Given the understanding here that Irillo was killed, we must look for future hints of his being replaced in related fragments of the Suppressed Saga
Piercing him through as he stood for his toasting

Berra cried out with the Shield of her Truth Rune
Placing her body between him and danger
Trusting companions to heal or to help him
Berra stood tall in the way of Assassin

Holding her hand to the danger before her
Berra caught fire in the form of an arrow
Cast it before her to die on the floor there
Guttering out with the life of her Master6Several oral recitations after this point hint at a Resurrection ritual, used to find where a spirit had gone, or a replacement of the dead Merchant with a living relative rehabilitated from the ire of the House Grandmother. No such action, and indeed no such death, is considered feasible by any serious writer. Alleyn considers this fragment unreliable, while Garin acknowledges only the existence of the manuscript, without commenting on the contents.

What Really Happened

Session Quotes

  • 1
    This fragment appears only in the Suppressed Saga, dating from c. 1630 and ordered burned in Esrolia. We discuss it as a matter written close to the time, despite its rather extraordinary central premise. This fragment is often understood as being in the Scorpion Folk style.
  • 2
    Irillo is never directly named here, hence the association with the Scorpion Folk
  • 3
    There is no indication of enchantment here; either Berra wore a combination of robes and armour as per the fashion of the later Temple of the Path, or robes were considered sufficient.
  • 4
    This would have been considered correct behaviour among Humakti, and rather odd among the Esrolian set of the time, who are likely to have considered the female Berra to have been a guest as well as a guard. The duality of Humakt the champion who is feasted, and Humakt the protector, is here apparent.
  • 5
    Even an attempted assassination, as is understood to have happened at this juncture, would have been shocking. Given the understanding here that Irillo was killed, we must look for future hints of his being replaced in related fragments of the Suppressed Saga
  • 6
    Several oral recitations after this point hint at a Resurrection ritual, used to find where a spirit had gone, or a replacement of the dead Merchant with a living relative rehabilitated from the ire of the House Grandmother. No such action, and indeed no such death, is considered feasible by any serious writer. Alleyn considers this fragment unreliable, while Garin acknowledges only the existence of the manuscript, without commenting on the contents.